Codon optimized SNF1-related protein kinase gene confers drought tolerance to a plant

ABSTRACT

The present invention relates to the isolation, purification, characterization and use of the plant Snf1-related protein kinase (SnRK) gene and genetic products. The invention includes isolated and purified SnRK DNA and relates to methods of regulating water loss and plant drought tolerance, sucrose content, starch content, seed oil content, fatty acid synthesis, seed oil acyl composition, seed size/weight, resistance/tolerance to biotic stresses, increased root biomass, and/or carbon flux into other seed components, plant, using the gene, and to tissues and plants transformed with the gene. The invention also relates to transgenic plants, plant tissues and plant seeds having a genome containing an introduced DNA sequence of the invention, and a method of producing such plants and plant seeds.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 61/168,532, filed Apr. 10, 2009, for “PLANT SNF1-RELATED PROTEIN KINASE GENE.”

TECHNICAL FIELD

This invention relates generally to plant genes useful for the genetic manipulation of plant characteristics. More specifically, the invention relates to the identification, isolation and introduction of Snf1-related protein kinase (SnRK) genes useful, for example, for altering plant water loss and plant drought tolerance, sucrose content, starch content, seed oil content, fatty acid synthesis, seed oil acyl composition, seed size/weight, resistance/tolerance to biotic stresses, increased biomass, and/or carbon flux into other seed components, in commercial or crop plants.

BACKGROUND

A large body of evidence demonstrates that the Snf1-related protein kinases serve as important regulators modulating fundamental metabolic pathways in response to nutritional and environmental stresses in yeast and mammalian cells (Hardie, 2007; Hardie and Carling, 1997; Hedbacker and Carlson, 2008). In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the sucrose non-fermenting kinase Snf1 is a serine/threonine protein kinase that is required for derepression of the transcription of glucose-repressible genes. It is also involved in gluconeogenesis, glycogen accumulation, mitochondrial and peroxisome biogenesis, and sporulation. The mammalian ortholog of the yeast Snf1 is the adenosine monophosphate (AMP)-activated protein kinase (AMPK).

Upon cellular stress responses that deplete ATP, AMPK is activated and thus phosphorylates and inhibits the enzymes involved in cholesterol and fatty acid biosynthesis. It is well documented that AMPK can inactivate 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA (HMG-CoA) reductase (a key regulatory enzyme in the synthesis of cholesterol and other isoprenoid compounds), acetyl CoA carboxylase (ACC) (the rate limiting enzyme in malonyl CoA synthesis), and hormone-sensitive lipase as well. Concurrently, AMPK triggers fatty acid catabolic pathways to promote ATP production. For instance, AMPK phosphorylates and activates malonyl-CoA decarboxylase (MCD), an enzyme involved in malonyl CoA degradation. More recently, a role for AMPK in inactivating glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferases has also been suggested in mammalian cells. AMPK, therefore, has the potential to regulate the synthesis and breakdown of triglycerides and cholesteryl esters.

Bioinformatic study of the completed sequence of Arabidopsis thaliana and rice genome revealed that, in plants, there are a large group of kinases related to the classical Snf1-type kinases from yeast. In Arabidopsis, Snf1-related kinases (SnRKs) are found on all five chromosomes and consist of 38 members. According to sequence similarity, these kinases can be classified into three subgroups: SnRK1 (three members), SnRK2 (ten members) and SnRK3 (25 members) (E. M. Hrabak et al., Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 666-680). The structure of individual kinase is comprised of kinase domain and regulatory domain. Although these kinases show relatively high similarity in the kinase catalytic domain at the N-terminus, their regulatory domains at the C-terminus are highly divergent, which are thought to function in protein-protein interactions or regulate kinase activity (E. M. Hrabak et al., Plant Physiol. 2003, 132, 666-680). This underlines complicated functionality for each kinase.

The SnRK1 kinases, based on sequence similarity, are the closest homologues of the yeast Snf1 kinase and the mammalian AMPK. They have been isolated from a variety of species including rye, Arabidopsis, tobacco, barley, rice, sugar-beet and potato. The findings that rye and tobacco genes can complement the Snf1 mutation in yeast predict a functional similarity of plant SnRK1 genes to Snf1. Accordingly, the role for plant SnRK1 in sugar metabolism has been suggested. Antisense expression of a SnRK1 in potato resulted in the loss of sugar-inducible expression of sucrose synthase (Purcell et al., Plant Journal 1998, 14:195-202). Additional work with these anti-sense lines indicates a potential role for SnRK1 kinases for impacting carbon flow through modulating post-translation modification of ADPglucose pyrophosphorylase, a key regulatory step in starch biosynthesis (Tiessen et al., Plant Journal 2003, 35:490-500). Additional supporting evidence came from the finding that antisense expression of SnRK1 in barley resulted in little or no starch accumulation in pollen grains, causing male sterility (Y. Zheng et al., Plant Journal 2001, 28:431-441).

Unlike SnRK1 group, no representatives of the SnRK2 and SnRK3 groups are found in animals and fungi, predicting their unique regulation of cellular responses in plants. Recently, it has been shown that SnRK3 kinases, also termed as CIPKs (CBL-interacting protein kinases), can interact with a novel family of plant calcium sensors, called calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) (Kudla et al., 1999; Shi et al., 1999; Kim et al., 2000). In Arabidopsis, ten members exist in the CBL family, each containing three EF-hands binding to calcium (Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004). Under stress conditions, calcium signatures change and decode specific interaction between different CBL and SnRK3 (CIPK) members, leading to altered expression of the downstream genes followed by specific physiological responses. For instance, CBL1 interacts with CIPK7 and CIPK9 to promote drought response, whereas CBL9 activates CIPK3 to enhance cold response. It is noted that the CBL-SnRK3 (CIPK) network largely interacts with the plant hormone abscisic acid (ABA), which is referred to as the stress hormone because of its pivotal roles in stress responses. The evidence supporting this mechanism includes: (i) as in stress conditions, ABA can induce the expression of CBL1 and CIPK3 genes; (ii) cbl9 and cipk3 mutants are hypersensitive to ABA; and (iii) overexpression of a member of SnRK3 group (designated PKS18, corresponding to annotated At5g45820) in Arabidopsis conferred hypersensitivity to ABA during seed germination, whereas silencing of the gene resulted in ABA-insensitivity (D. Gong et al., J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 277:42088-42096).

Because of low sequence similarity in the C-terminal domains of the kinases, SnRK2 group can be further divided into two subgroups, namely SnRK2a and SnRK2b (M. Boudsocq et al., J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:41758-66; T. Umezawa et al., PNAS 2004, 101:17306-17311). SnRK2a consist of SnRK2.2, SnRK2.3, SnRK2.6, SnRK2.7 and SnRK2.8. The other five members, SnRK2.1, SnRK2.4, SnRK2.5, SnRK2.9 and SnRK2.10, belong to SnRK2b subgroup (Umezawa et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:17306-11). Several studies demonstrated that individual kinases in SnRK2 subgroup may have distinct roles in biological processes. For instance, although SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.3 are two protein kinases most closely related to SnRK2.6 based on sequence similarity (Hrabak et al., 2003), they function very differently from SnRK2.6. SnRK2.2 and SnRK2.3 have been shown to be the key protein kinases mediating ABA signaling during seed germination and seedling growth. However, as a positive regulator of ABA signaling, SnRK2.6 is involved in ABA-mediated regulation of stomatal aperture, whereas seed dormancy and germination are not affected in Arabidopsis SnRK2.6 mutants (Mustilli et al., 2002; Yoshida et al., 2006).

It is believed that there exist at least three factors underscoring specialized functionality for each kinase in SnRK2 subgroup. First, individual kinases may show different temporal and spatial expression. For instance, SnRK2-8 is expressed abundantly in roots and weakly in leaves and siliques (Umezawa et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2004, 101:17306-11); SnRK2-6 is mainly expressed in guard cells and vascular tissues in Arabidopsis (Mustilli et al., 2002); and although SnRK2-2 and SnRK2-3 both display the widespread expression in various tissues, SnRK2-3 shows particularly strong expression in root tips (Fujii et al., Plant Cell, 2007, 19:485-494). Second, the regulatory domains at the C-terminus are highly divergent among different SnRK2 kinases although the kinase domains are fairly conserved. For instance, overall sequence similarity between SnRK2-4 and SnRK2-6 kinases is 70%, whereas there is only 30% identity in the C-terminal domain. This suggests that the interaction of SNRK2-6 with other signaling components may be different from that of SnRK2-4, thereby predicting different functions conferred by these two kinases. Supporting evidence came from the finding that these two kinases respond to different environmental cues (M. Boudsocq et al., J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 41758-66). In addition, the role of the C-terminal domain in controlling the physiological function of the kinases was experimentally verified (Belin et al., 2006; Yoshida et al., 2006). Lastly, slight structure difference of the kinases may lead to different subcellular localization. To understand how each kinase functions, it is necessary to understand where it is localized in a living cell.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the invention is drawn to a process for producing a plant, plant seed or progeny thereof, the process comprising: transforming a plant cell with a nucleic acid sequence encoding a Snf1-related protein kinase protein; growing a plant from the plant cell until the plant produces seed; and harvesting the seed from the plant. Another embodiment of the invention includes a seed harvested from the plant produced by the process of producing the plant. Also included is a plant, plant seed, or progeny thereof having the nucleic acid sequence encoding the Snf1-related protein kinase protein incorporated in a genome thereof.

Another aspect of the invention includes a method of changing the oil, sugar, or starch content of a plant, plant storage organ or plant seed, which process includes introducing a sense or anti-sense nucleic acid construct into a plant transformation vector to produce a modified plant transformation vector, wherein said sense or anti-sense nucleic acid construct comprises the isolated, purified or recombinant nucleic acid sequence encoding an Arabidopsis Snf1-related protein kinase (SnRK) protein. The plant, plant storage organ or plant seed's genome is transformed with the modified plant transformation vector. The plant, plant storage organ, or plant seed is grown and oil or biopolymer is then extracted. Genetically transformed plants and plant seeds having a genome that has been transformed by the vector are also included as an additional aspect of the invention. Such plants and plant seeds may be characterized as exhibiting an altered respiration rate, altered seed oil content, altered fatty acid composition, enhanced biomass, enhanced capacity to accumulate biopolymers, and increased root growth compared to a genomically unmodified plant of the same genotype.

In a particular embodiment, a method of modulating the level of Snf1-related protein kinase protein in a plant, includes: stably transforming a plant cell with a plant Snf1-related protein kinase polynucleotide operably linked to a promoter, wherein the polynucleotide is in sense or antisense orientation; and growing the plant cell under plant growing conditions to produce a regenerated plant capable of expressing the polynucleotide for a time sufficient to modulate the Snf1-related protein kinase protein in the plant.

Another embodiment is drawn to a process for extracting oil from a transgenic seed, the process comprising: transforming a plant cell with means for encoding a Snf1-related protein kinase protein; growing a plant from the plant cell until the plant produces seed; harvesting the seed from the plant; and extracting oil from the harvested seed. Oil produced by the process of this process is also included.

Yet another embodiment is drawn to a vector for transformation of plant cells, characterized in that said vector contains a deoxyribonucleic acid sequence according to SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a part of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a sequence that is substantially homologous to SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3. Also included as an embodiment is a plant or plant seed having a genome, characterized in that said genome contains an introduced nucleotide sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a part of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a sequence that is substantially homologous to SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3. Likewise included in particular embodiments are methods of producing transgenic plants by introducing a nucleotide sequence into a genome of said plant, characterized in that said nucleotide sequence introduced into said genome includes SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a part of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a sequence that is substantially homologous to SEQ ID NO:1, or to SEQ ID NO:3, or a part of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3.

Another aspect of the invention includes a method of changing the oil content, fatty acid composition, or seed yield of a plant by introducing a sense or anti-sense nucleic acid construct into a plant transformation vector, using the vector to transform the genome of a plant or plant seed, and then growing the plant or plant seed and extracting the oil from the plant seed, characterized in that said nucleic sequence is SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a part of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, or a sequence that is substantially homologous to SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3. Yet another aspect of the invention includes a plant, a plant seed, and progeny of a plant that is further transformed by a vector comprising a Snf1-related protein kinase means for altering the oil content of the plant material functionally associated with a promoter.

In yet another embodiment of the invention, a method of altering the drought tolerance of a plant, said method includes: introducing a nucleic acid construct comprising a nucleic acid sequence, selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:3, encoding a polypeptide having Snf-1 related protein kinase activity into a plant transformation vector; transforming the genome of a plant or plant seed with said plant transformation vector; expressing the nucleic acid sequence; growing the plant or plant seed; and selecting a transformed plant having the altered drought tolerance as compared to an average drought tolerance of a statistically significant number of plants of the same genotype as the plant grown in identical conditions, but without the introduced nucleotide sequence.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a graph showing the comparison of the number of lateral shoots in the stems in 34-day-old wild-type (wt) and SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana designated as 340293, 340318, 340367, 340378 and 340397. Error bars are ±SD.

FIG. 2 is a plot showing water loss in detached aerial portions of 27-day-old wild-type (wt) and transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana. Each of the data points represents the average of 5 independent transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana. The water loss is reported as a percent of initial fresh weight from 0 hours to 6 hours after detachment of the aerial portions from the plant. The significant difference in water loss between wt and transgenic is illustrated by P (ttest)<0.004.

FIG. 3 is a plot showing water loss in detached aerial portions of 27-day-old homozygous (knockout) and null (null) for T-DNA insertion in SALK_(—)008068 in Arabidopsis thaliana. The water loss is reported as a percent of initial fresh weight from 0 hours to 6 hours after detachment of the aerial portions from the plant. The significant difference in water loss between wt and transgenic is illustrated by P (ttest)<0.004.

FIG. 4 is a graph showing soluble sugar content (nmol/g of glucose, fructose and sucrose) in leaves from 30-day-old wild-type (wt) and T3 SnRK2-6 transgenic lines (340293, 340318, 340367, 340378 and 340397) of Arabidopsis thaliana. Each of the data points represents the average of five independent SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana (340293, 340318, 340367, 340378 and 340397). Error bars are ±SD (n=8 or 10 plants of each line sampled).

FIG. 5 is a graph showing starch content in leaves from 30-day-old wild-type (wt) and five independent SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana. Each of the data points represents the average of five independent SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana (340293, 340318, 340367, 340378 and 340397). The starch content is reported as nmol/g of the total starch content of leaves from each line. Error bars are ±SD (n=8 or 10 plants of each line sampled).

FIG. 6 is a graph showing a comparison of the fatty acid composition of leaves from wild-type (wt) and SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana. Each of the data points represents the average of five independent SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana (340293, 340318, 340367, 340378 and 340397). Proportions of fatty acids are reported as Mol % of the total composition of leaves from each line. Error bars are ±SD (n=10 plants of each line sampled).

FIG. 7 is a graph showing a comparison of the seed yield per plant in wild-type (wt) and SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of Arabidopsis thaliana. More specifically, it is a comparison of the seed yield under normal, mild and severe growth conditions. Plants grown under “normal” conditions were watered well during the entire growth cycle. Irrigation was ceased for 6 days during the flowering stage in plants grown under “mild” conditions. Irrigation was ceased for 16 days during the vegetative stage in plants grown under “severe” conditions. Error bars are ±SD (n=30 plants of each line sampled). The significant difference in seed yield between wt and transgenic lines is illustrated by P (ttest)<0.001.

FIG. 8 is a plot showing water loss in detached leaf portions of 34-day-old null segregants (null) and SnRK2-6 transgenic lines of corn plants (transgenic). Each of the data points represents the average of 8 independent transgenic lines of corn plants. Five null segregants and five kinase-containing plants from each independent line, all of which showed very similar size, were used. For each plant, the uppermost leaf with a visible collar was excised and used in the assay. The water loss is reported as a percent of initial fresh weight from 0 minutes to 180 minutes after detachment of the aerial portions from the plant. The significant difference in water loss between null and transgenic lines is illustrated by P (ttest)<0.003.

FIGS. 9A-9C are plots showing water loss in detached leaves of 34-day-old null segregants (null) and SnRK2-6-containing corn plants (transgenic) from three independent lines. Each of the data points represents the average of five independent corn plants from the same line. For each plant, the uppermost leaf with a visible collar was excised and used in the assay. The water loss is reported as a percent of initial fresh weight from 0 minutes to 90 minutes after detachment of the aerial portions from the plant.

FIG. 10 is a graph showing a comparison of the root biomass in null segregants (null) and SnRK2-6-containing corn plants (transgenic) from four independent lines, which are designated as 2280(1)006.006R.011R, 2280(2)015.006R.008R, 2280(2)016.004R.017R and 2280(3)025.006R.007R. Aerial portions were cut and the roots were collected by removing soil and then dried in greenhouse for 7 days to eliminate moisture variation among different samples.

FIG. 11 a map of plasmid pDAB4504 which may be used as a vector. The vector contains the following salient features for plant transformation in the current invention: a CsVMV promoter, SnRK2-6 and an AtuORF24 3′-UTR.

FIG. 12 is a map of plasmid pDAB7702, which may be used as a vector. The vector contains the following salient features for plant transformation in the current invention: the maize Ubi1 promotor, SnRK2-6 hv, and ZmPer5 3′UTR.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

One embodiment of the invention is drawn to identification, isolation and cloning of a genetic element that may be used to modify the natural formation of triacylglycerols in plants in order to increase the yield of commercial plant oils, or to modify their composition to achieve specific commercial improvements of plants and plant products.

Another embodiment of the invention relates to isolation and characterization of Snf1-related protein kinase (SnRK) gene and cDNA sequences from Arabidopsis species and to utilization of these sequences in the genetic manipulation of plants.

Yet another embodiment of the invention is to provide a vector containing the full-length SnRK coding sequence or a significant portion of SnRK sequences from Arabidopsis in a sense orientation under the control of a promoter (e.g., CsVMV or Ubi1), for re-introducing into Arabidopsis species or for introducing into other plants. In an alternative embodiment of the invention, there is provided a vector containing a genomic fragment from Arabidopsis consisting of the full-length SnRK gene, or a significant portion of SnRK sequences from Arabidopsis species, under the control of its own 5′ upstream regulatory sequences, for re-introducing into Arabidopsis species or for introducing into other plants.

Also included is a method to construct a vector containing the full-length SnRK sequence or a significant portion of the SnRK sequence from Arabidopsis, in an antisense orientation under control of a promoter, for re-introducing into Arabidopsis or for introducing into other plants. Another particular method includes modifying Arabidopsis and other plants to change their seed oil content, their fatty acid composition, their average seed weight or size, and/or their water loss and plant drought tolerance. Other methods of the invention involve modifying Arabidopsis and other plants to promote growth and development, such as increasing root biomass, or to change their photosynthetic activity, thus increasing sugar and starch content.

According to another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a vector containing isolated and purified deoxyribonucleic acid (cDNA) of SEQ ID NO:1 (pSnRKcDNA), for introduction of the cDNA in a sense orientation into a plant cell. As another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a vector containing isolated and purified plant optimized deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) of SEQ ID NO:3 (pSnRK2-6 hv5 gene), for introduction of the gene in a sense orientation into a plant cell. According to yet another aspect of the invention, there is provided a method for preparing a vector containing SEQ ID NO:1 or a part thereof, or SEQ ID NO:3, or a part thereof, for introduction of the gene or partial gene in an antisense orientation, into a plant cell.

Another embodiment includes providing a mutant seed line of Arabidopsis thaliana. The mutant seed line has an insertion mutation in a SnRK gene (as shown in Table 1 below), and produces plants exhibiting increased SnRK activity, resulting in an increase in leaf size and lateral shoot number, decreased water loss, increased sugar and starch content, altered seed fatty acyl composition, increased seed yield, and increased root biomass. The cDNA sequence of the SnRK2-6 is shown in SEQ ID NO:1, the plant-optimized DNA sequence is shown in SEQ ID NO:3 and the translated protein sequence of the SnRK2-6 is shown in SEQ ID NO:2.

The invention also relates to transgenic plants and plant seeds having a genome containing an introduced DNA sequence of SEQ ID NO:1 or SEQ ID NO:3, and a method of producing such plants and plant seeds.

The invention further relates to substantially homologous DNA sequences from plants with deduced amino acid sequences of 25% or greater identity, and 50% or greater similarity, isolated and/or characterized by known methods using the sequence information of SEQ ID NO:1, or SEQ ID NO:3, as will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art, and to parts of reduced length that are still able to function as inhibitors of gene expression by use in an anti-sense or co-suppression (Jorgensen and Napoli 1994) application. It will be appreciated by persons skilled in the art that small changes in the identities of nucleotides in a specific gene sequence may result in reduced or enhanced effectiveness of the genes and that, in some applications (e.g., anti-sense or co-suppression), partial sequences often work as effectively as full length versions. The ways in which the gene sequence can be varied or shortened are well known to persons skilled in the art, as are ways of testing the effectiveness of the altered genes. All such variations of the genes are therefore claimed as part of the present invention.

When considering altered leaf size, lateral shoot number, water loss, or sugar, starch or oil contents or compositions, results from averages of statistically significant numbers of plants or seeds according to the invention are best compared with results from averages of statistically significant numbers of untransformed (control) plants or seeds of the same genotype grown under identical conditions at the same time. This allows for the variability of individual plants of the same genotype, particularly when such plants are grown under different conditions. The actual number of plants or seeds used to form the required average may vary, but should be enough to provide a generally constant average whenever such number is selected. Generally, the number should be at least ten, and is more preferably at least 20, 30, 50 or 100.

The SnRK of the current invention is useful in manipulating SnRK activity, and water loss, drought tolerance, carbon assimilation, plant growth and development, fatty acid bioassembly, and root growth in plants. For example, by transforming plants with a construct containing the SnRK gene in a sense orientation, under the control of a promoter (e.g., CsVMV or Ubi1), the expression of SnRK cDNA and drought tolerance may be enhanced or the composition of the plant altered. This may have particular advantages for altering the drought tolerance and starch/oil ratio in root crops. In some embodiments, plants transformed with a construct containing the SnRk gene may also include additional heterologous or altered genes that further enhance resistance to water loss, drought tolerance, carbon assimilation, plant growth and development, fatty acid bioassembly, and root growth in these plants.

Alternatively, SnRK expression can be silenced to some degree by anti-sense or co-suppression (Transwitch) phenomena (De Lange et al., 1995; Mol et al., 1990; Jorgensen and Napoli, 1994; Kinney, 1995; Vaucheret et al., 1998; Taylor, 1998). For example, silencing SnRK in a seed-specific manner may result in a reduction in SnRK accumulation. This could have applications in reducing the starch, sugar, and/or oil content or ratio in seed root crops to enhance stability during storage.

Some of the manipulations and deliverables which are possible using the SnRK gene or a part thereof, include, but are not limited to, the following: seeds with increased or decreased oil content; leaves containing increased or decreased sugar or starch content; seed oils with an altered fatty acid composition; plants exhibiting decreased water loss; plants exhibiting an enhanced or altered capacity to accumulate storage compounds in other storage organs (e.g., tubers, roots, and leaves); and plants having an increased root growth and biomass.

Several SnRK2 and SnRK3 kinases have been shown to play critical roles in the response to abiotic stress through ABA signaling cascade. This suggests a possibility that some SnRK kinases may function as a regulator of plant lipid metabolism given the vital role of ABA in this metabolism. During seed germination, ABA decreases transcription of the genes involved in fatty acid beta-oxidation and glyoxylate cycle, which are essential pathways for the conversion of the storage lipid, triacylglycerol, into sucrose (S. L. Pritchard et al., Plant J. 2002, 31:639-647). On the other hand, ABA increases and behaves as a positive regulator for triacylglycerol synthesis during embryo development. It has been shown that reduction of ABA by seed-specific immunomodulation results in less production of tobacco seed oil (J. Phillips et al., EMBO J. 1997, 16:4489-4496). Conversely, treatment of immature maize embryos with ABA (4 μM) elevated the activities of fatty acyltransferases and thus increased oil yield (F. Pacheco-Moises et al., Plant Physiol. 1997, 114:1095-1101). This effect has been observed from many other species including Arabidopsis, Brassica (napus, juncea and rape), peanut, carrot, wheat, spruce, almond and ground-nut (Arachis hypogaea). Nevertheless, it has remained unknown if any SnRK kinases mediate ABA regulation of seed oil synthesis.

In an attempt to identify those key kinases involved in seed oil production, a reverse genetic approach was used. This is based on screening of SALK T-DNA insertion into the genes, followed by determining the impact of the gene knockout on seed oil content and seed yield. After large scale screening, the role of SnRK2-6 gene (At4g33950) in seed oil production was uncovered. This gene, also named OST1 (OPEN STOMATA 1), was previously demonstrated to encode the protein possessing calcium-dependent protein serine/threonine kinase activity and regulate ABA-mediated stomatal aperture (Mustilli et al., 2002). Inactivation of this gene by T-DNA insertion resulted in 24% to 50% reduction in seed yield under dehydration condition. In addition, a 7% to 25% decrease in seed oil content was detected in the knockout line SALK-008068. However, protein content only showed little change between plants homozygous for the insertion (21.3%) and null segregants (20.9%), indicating that SnRK2-6, a member of SnRK2a subgroup, acts as a positive regulator for seed oil production.

SnRK2-6 was previously identified as a regulator of ABA-mediated stomatal conductance, which is preferentially expressed in stomata and vascular tissues in Arabidopsis (Mustilli et al., 2002; Fujii et al., Plant Cell 2007, 19:485-494). Reverse genetic studies in the present invention uncovered its role in seed oil production.

SnRK2-6 was ectopically expressed under a constitutive promoter, CsVMV, in Arabidopsis. The forced ectopic expression of SnRK2-6 by CsVMV may disrupt highly spatially localized pattern of SnRK2-6 expression driven by the native promoter, giving rise to a pattern different from normal. Such perturbation may influence plant growth and metabolisms.

Referring to FIG. 1, overexpression of SnRK2-6 in Arabidopsis was demonstrated to promote leaf growth, and further to increase lateral shoot number. Additionally, water loss was shown to be substantially reduced in the excised transgenic plants compared to wild-type plants demonstrating that overexpression of SnRK2-6 may reduce transpiration rate of aerial parts of the plants. In contrast, knockout of this gene accelerated water loss, as shown in FIG. 3.

As shown in FIG. 4, increased carbon assimilation in transgenic Arabidopsis plants may demonstrate that overexpression of SnRK2-6 may promote plant growth. More specifically, transgenic Arabidopsis plants overexpressing SnRK2-6 showed a dramatic increase in the contents of fructose, glucose and sucrose in the transgenic leaves under normal greenhouse conditions. Total sugar content in the transgenic leaves was twice as much as in the wild-type leaves. Starch content of the transgenic plants was actually 156% of wild type level. Referring to FIGS. 4 and 5, the knockout of SnRK2-6 did not largely affect either soluble sugar or starch content. Collectively, these results indicate that the constitutive expression of the SnRK2-6 transgene can increase leaf photosynthetic activity leading to increased carbon assimilation.

FIG. 6 shows the dramatic change in fatty acid composition in the transgenic leaves. Two trienoic fatty acids, 16:3 and 18:3, in leaves of the transgenic plants increased by 81% and 26%, respectively, relative to wild type, indicating the desaturation processes is strengthened by the transgene.

Consistent with increased photosynthetic activity in the leaves, a drastic increase in seed yield in transgenic plants was detected. As compared to wild type plants, the transgenic plants showed a 24%, 16% and 35% increase in seed yield, respectively, under normal conditions, mild drought conditions, and severe drought conditions (FIG. 7). The results suggest that the transgene not only enhances plant drought tolerance, but also alter other physiological processes, leading to increased seed production under normal growth condition.

Seed oil analysis showed that CsVMV-driven expression of SnRK2-6 did not result in a significant change in seed oil content. However, overall seed oil production increased by the transgene due to increased seed yield.

Taken together, the constitutive overexpression of SnRK2-6 drastically increased the contents of soluble sugars and starch and altered lipid biosynthesis in Arabidopsis leaves. This further resulted in a large increase in seed yield under both normal and drought conditions.

As shown in FIG. 10, increased root biomass in transgenic corn plants may demonstrate that overexpression of SnRK2-6 may promote root growth. The transgenic corn plants overexpressing SnRK2-6 showed a dramatic increase in root biomass (i.e., 11%, 25%, 92%, and 15%) in comparison to null plants. These results indicate that SnRK2-6 kinase can increase root growth. Such a mechanism may be associated with the increase corn drought tolerance.

Particularly preferred plants for modification according to the present invention include Arabidopsis thaliana, borage (Borago spp.), Canola, castor (Ricinus communis), cocoa bean (Theobroma cacao), corn (Zea mays), cotton (Gossypium spp), Crambe spp., Cuphea spp., flax (Linum spp.), Lesquerella and Limnanthes spp., Linola, nasturtium (Tropaeolum spp.), Oenothera spp., olive (Olea spp.), palm (Elaeis spp.), peanut (Arachis spp.), rapeseed, safflower (Carthamus spp.), soybean (Glycine and Soja spp.), sunflower (Helianthus spp.), tobacco (Nicotiana spp.), Vernonia spp., wheat (Triticum spp.), barley (Hordeum spp.), rice (Oryza spp.), oat (Avena spp.) sorghum (Sorghum spp.), rye (Secale spp.) or other members of the Gramineae.

The present invention is particularly useful when used to modify the yield or composition of oilseed produced from oilseed crops. Oilseed crops are plant species that are capable of generating edible or industrially useful oils in commercially significant yields, and include many of the plant species listed above. Such oilseed crops are well known to persons skilled in the art.

The SnRK2-6 gene may be introduced with one or more other genes that confer desirable traits in plants. For example, a stress tolerance gene or a drought tolerance gene may, optionally, be introduced in combination with the SnRK2-6 gene.

The invention is further described by use of the following illustrative examples.

EXAMPLES Example 1 Identification of T-DNA Insertion into Arabidopsis SnRK Genes by PCR

According to sequence similarity, Arabidopsis SnRK kinases can be divided into three subgroups, SnRK1, SnRK2 and SnRK3. SnRK1 subgroup includes three kinases encoded by At3g01090, At3g29160, and At5g39440, respectively. SnRK2 subgroup consists of ten members corresponding to the genes At4g40010, At2g23030, At1g60940, At1g10940, At5g63650, At5g08590, At1g78290, At3g50500, At5g66880, and At4g33950, respectively. SnRK3 is the largest subgroup with 25 members encoded by the genes: At5g57630, At3g17510, At1g48260, At4g24400, At5g35410, At2g26980, At1g30270, At1g01140, At4g14580, At3g23000, At2g38490, At5g01820, At2g30360, At2g34180, At1g29230, At5g45810, At4g18700, At4g30960, At5g45820, At5g58380, At5g07070, At5g01810, At2g25090, At5g25110, and At5g10930.

In SALK lines with T-DNA insertion into SnRK genes, plants homozygous, heterozygous and null for the insertion were screened by PCR as shown in Tables 1 and 2. Genomic DNA used in PCR reactions was isolated from Arabidopsis leaves. As an example, GSP108 and LBa1 primers were used to screen for plants carrying the T-DNA insertion into SnRK2-6 (At4g33950) in SALK_(—)008068. On the other hand, GSP108 and GSP124, two gene-specific primers of At4g33950, were used to determine if a wild-type copy of the gene is present in the segregants of SALK_(—)008068.

TABLE 1 The SnRK gene family and the corresponding SALK T-DNA insertion lines Gene name SALK lines Insertion position Gene-specific primer SnRK1 group (3) At3g01090 (Akin10) At3g29160 (Akin11) At5g39440 SnRK2 group (10) At4g40010 (SnRK2-7) SALK_042333 (S1) intron GSP101 At2g23030 (SnRK2-9) SALK_152137 (S25) exon GSP127 and GSP126 * At1g60940 (SnRK2-10) SALK_064987 (S3) 300-UTR3 At1g10940 (SnRK2-4) SALK_080588 (S4) exon GSP103 At5g63650 (SnRK2-5) SALK_075624 (S5) exon GSP104 At5g08590 (SnRK2-1) At1g78290 (SnRK2-8) SALK_031421 (S7) intron GSP106 SALK_069354 (S8) exon GSP106 At3g50500 (SnRK2-2) At5g66880 (SnRK2-3) SALK_096546 (S9) exon GSP107 At4g33950 (SnRK2-6) SALK_008068 (S10) intron GSP108 and GSP124 * SnRK3 group (25) At5g57630 (CIPK21) At3g17510 (CIPK1) At1g48260 (CIPK17) SALK_062790 (S27) exon GSP131 and GSP130 * At4g24400 (CIPK8) At5g35410 (CIPK24, SOS2) SALK_016683 (S11) intron GSP109 At2g26980 (CIPK3) SALK_033968 (S12) exon SALK_064491 (S12-1) GSP122, GSP123 and GSP121 * At1g30270 (CIPK23) SALK_032341 (S13) intron GSP110 At1g01140 (CIPK9) SALK_014699 (S14) intron GSP111 At4g14580 (CIPK4) SALK_009893 (S15) exon GSP112 At3g23000 (CIPK7) SALK_055008 (S16) exon GSP113 At2g38490 (CIPK22) SALK_135490 (S28) exon GSP133 and GSP132 * At5g01820 (CIPK14) SALK_009699 (S17) exon GSP114 At2g30360 (CIPK11) SALK_055565 (S18) exon GSP115 and GSP125 * At2g34180 (CIPK13) SALK_124748 (S19) exon GSP116 At1g29230 (CIPK18) SALK_011025 (S20) 300-UTR5 GSP117 At5g45810 (CIPK19) SALK_044735 (S21) exon GSP118 At4g18700 (CIPK12) SALK_039840 (S22) 1000-P At4g30960 (CIPK6) At5g45820 (CIPK20) SALK_040637 (S23) 1000-P GSP119 At5g58380 (CIPK10) SALK_111320 (S24) exon GSP120 At5g07070 (CIPK2) At5g01810 (CIPK15) At2g25090 (CIPK16) At5g25110 (CIPK25) SALK_079011 (S29) exon GSP135 and GSP134 * At5g10930 (CIPK5) SALK_084456 (S26) exon GSP128 and GSP129 * “*” stands for GSP (gene-specific primer) which has the same direction as LBal; “S#” is DAS internal sample number.

TABLE 2 The nucleotide sequences of  gene-specific primers and LBa1 Primer  Nucleotide  name sequence LBa1 5′-TGGTTCACGTAGTGGGCCATCG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 7) GSP101 5′-TCTTGGTTCCGGTAACTTTGGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 8) GSP103 5′-CCAACGACGACTTCTTTCTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 9) GSP104 5′-TTGGTCAATTGCGTAGATAAAG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 10) GSP106 5′-GCAAAGCAGCTTCCCAAGAAGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 11) GSP107 5′-CTCCGCTACTGTCAATGTCGAT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 12) GSP108 5′-GCAGTGAGTGGTCCAATGGATT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 13) GSP109 5′-GCTCAAGAAGCAAATCTTCCAATC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 14) GSP110 5′-TCTCGCTTGCTGTTACTCGCTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 15) GSP111 5′-CCTTAAAACCAGGCAGCCACTA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 16) GSP112 5′-ATCACAGGGACAGTTCTTCTCG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 17) GSP113 5′-TCAGGCACCATTTTCTCCTTCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 18) GSP114 5′-CCGAATCCTCCCAATTTGTCTG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 19) GSP115 5′-AGAAACCAAATCCAACCAACGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 20) GSP116 5′-CCCAACGCCAATACAATTCATG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 21) GSP117 5′-TTTCTCCAGCTCTGGTCTGAGTTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 22) GSP118 5′-GAAGAAGCAGGATCAGAGCAATCA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 23) GSP119 5′-GTTGTTTCCTTGCCATTTCCAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 24) GSP120 5′-GTAAGCTCATCTTTCTCACCCTGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 25) GSP121 5′-TCGGAGACAGCAAGTGAAACG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 26) GSP122 5′-TTTTGAACATCGAAACCGAGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 27) GSP123 5′-GAAGACTTGGCGCTACTTGGAA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 28) GSP124 5′-CCGCTACTGTCGATGTCAAGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 29) GSP125 5′-ATGCCAGAGATCGAGATTGCC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 30) GSP126 5′-TGGTGAAGGATTTAGGATTTGG-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 31) GSP127 5′-TTATCTGATCCAAGCGATTCGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 32) GSP129 5′-ATGGAGGAAGAACGGCGAGTTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 33) GSP130 5′-GATGATGAGCCCAGCTCATTCA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 34) GSP131 5′-GGTGATAAAGGGAATGCGTGTT-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 35) GSP132 5′-AACCGGTTGGTTAATCAAACGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 36) GSP133 5′-TGGCCGAAGACTCTAATTCTTC-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 37) GSP134 5′-TATGATTATCACCGTGCCACGA-3′ (SEQ ID NO: 38) In combination with LBa1 (the T-DNA left border primer), GSPs were used for PCR screening of plants carrying T-DNA insertion into the SnRK genes.

To establish the function for each kinase in seed oil production, oil profiles in the seeds of SALK lines carrying the insertion into the kinase genes were determined by gas chromatography. To better assess the impact caused by the disruption of the kinase genes, null siblings from the same lines were used as control. Theoretically, null siblings have higher similarity in genetic background to other segregants homozygous and heterozygous for the insertion as compared to wild type.

Example 2 Arabidopsis Seed Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Analysis

Extraction and Derivatization of Arabidopsis Seeds

Mature Arabidopsis seeds were harvested and all non-seed plant matter removed. From the total seed harvested, ˜10 mg aliquots were taken and distributed into 1 ml capacity 96-well plate. Precise weight measurements were obtained by the use of an analytical balance with and accuracy of +/−2 μg and recorded. The well plate was rinsed with hexane prior to use and two 4 mm diameter stainless steel homogenizing bead placed into each well. After sample distribution, 0.4 ml hexane containing 75 ppm methyl heptadecanoate and 0.2 ml 0.5 M sodium methoxide was dispensed to each well. The well plate was then capped and placed into a vertical shaker for two minutes at 500 strokes per minute then changed to 58 minutes at 250 strokes per minute. Once shaking was complete, the well plate was then centrifuged for five minutes at 5600 ref. After centrifuging, the top hexane extract layer was taken and placed into another 96-well plate. This extraction was performed twice more with 0.4 ml hexane, combining each subsequent extract with the first. The second and third extraction vertical shaking conditions were changed to 30 minutes at 250 strokes per minute per extraction. The combined 1.2 ml hexane extracts were diluted 10 fold into another 96-well plate for analysis by GC-FID.

Fatty Acid Methyl Ester (FAME) Analysis

The resulting fatty acid methyl esters Arabidopsis seed lipids were resolved on a SGE BPX70 capilary column (15 m, ID 0.22, df 0.25) using a three ramp temperature gradient with 1 ml/minute hydrogen as the carrier gas (60° C. held for 1.34 minutes, 41.3° C./minute to 150° C., 9.1° C./minute to 180° C., 41.3° C./minute to 220° C. held for 1.86 minutes). Inlet temperature was 230° C. and flame ionization detector temperature was 240° C. Identification and quantitation of the FAME analysis by retention time was accomplished with a rapeseed oil reference standard (manufactured by Matreya) with 75 ppm methyl heptadecanoate.

Example 3 Arabidopsis Leaf Fatty Acid Methyl Ester Analysis

Extraction and Derivatization of Arabidopsis Leaf Lipids

Frozen Arabidopsis leaves were ground to fine powder under liquid nitrogen by using mortar and pestle. From this powder ˜50 mg aliquots were taken and distributed into 1 ml capacity 96-well plate. The well plate was rinsed with hexane prior to use and a 4-mm diameter stainless steel homogenizing bead placed into each well. After sample distribution, 0.5 ml hexane and 0.25 ml 0.5 M sodium methoxide was dispensed to each well. The well plate was then capped and placed into a vertical shaker for 30 minutes at 250 strokes per minute. The well plate was then centrifuged for 5 minutes at 5600 ref. After centrifuging, the top hexane extract layer was taken and placed into another 96-well plate for analysis by gas chromatograph flame ionization.

FAME's Analysis

The resulting fatty acid methyl esters Arabidopsis leaf lipids were resolved on a SGE BPX70 capilary column (15 m, ID 0.22, df 0.25) using a three ramp temperature gradient with 1 ml/minute hydrogen as the carrier gas (60° C. held for 1.34 minutes, 41.3° C./minute to 150° C., 9.1° C./minute to 180° C., 41.3° C./minute to 220° C. held for 1.86 minutes). Inlet temperature was 230° C. and flame ionization detector temperature was 240° C. Identification of FAME's by retention time was accomplished with a rapeseed oil reference standard (manufactured by Matreya).

Example 4 Arabidopsis Seed Total Protein Analysis

Acidic Digestion of Arabidopsis Seeds (Protein Hydrolysis)

Mature Arabidopsis seeds were harvested and all non-seed plant matter removed. From the total seed harvested, ˜20 mg aliquots were taken and distributed into 2 ml autoclaveable centrifuge tubes with rubber o-ringed screw caps. Precise weight measurements were obtained by the use of an analytical balance with and accuracy of +/−2 μg and recorded. Ten acid washed 4-mm glass beads were added to each centrifuge tube prior to use. After sample distribution, the centrifuge tubes were placed onto a vertical shaker at 500 strokes per minute for five minutes. Then 1.4 ml of 6 N hydrochloric acid with 0.1% phenol and 1% 2-mercaptoethanol was added to each sample. The centrifuge tubes were then placed back onto a vertical shaker for 15 minutes at 500 strokes per minute. After vertical shaking was complete, the centrifuge tubes were placed onto a heating block at 100° C. for 24 hours completing the digestion. Once the digestion process was finished, the centrifuge tubes were cooled to room temperature and digest filtered through a 0.4 μm glass filter. 0.1 ml of the filtered digested was diluted in a 1.5 ml glass injection vial with 0.3 ml 2 N sodium hydroxide, 0.6 ml water, and 0.1 ml water with 1000 pmol/μl norvaline as an internal standard for analysis by High Performance Liquid Chromatography Fluorescence Detection.

Derivatization of Amino Acid Residues

Primary amino acids were derivatized with o-phthalaldehyde (OPA). Secondary amino acids were derivatized with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC). Both derivatization reactions were accomplished pre-column using the HPLC injection loop. Samples were first buffered with 0.4 N borate buffer at 10.2 pH (4 μl buffer to 1 μl sample) and then mixed with OPA and FMOC (1 μl OPA and 1 μl FMOC in order). The samples were then injected for analysis.

Analysis of Amino Acid Residues by HPLC-FLD

Derivatized amino acid residues were resolved on a 150×3.0 mm 5 μm C18(2) reverse phase column with a 40° C. binary elution gradient. The aqueous phase (eluent A) consisted of 40 mM sodium phosphate buffer at 7.8 pH and the organic phase (eluent B) consisted of acteonitrile:methanol:water (45:45:10 v/v/v). The solvent gradient system was 0-1.9 min A/B (%) 100:0; 1.9-18.1 min A/B (%) 43:57; 18.1-18.6 min A/B (%) 0:100; 18.6-22.3 min A/B (%) 0:100; 22.3-23.2 min A/B (%) 100:0; 23.2-26 A/B (%) 100:0. The flow was a constant 2 ml/minute.

The fluorescent detector parameters were set for excitation at 340 nm and emission at 450 nm for the first 15 minutes of the analysis. The detector then switches to 266 nm excitation and 305 nm emission for the remainder of the analysis time. The first 15 minutes of analysis is optimized for the detection of OPA derivative residues and the remainder for FMOC derivative residues.

Identification and quantitation of amino acid residues was calibrated with amino acid standard mixes (purchased from Agilent Technologies) containing 90.9 pmol/μl norvaline internal standard. Residues quantitated were aspartic acid, glutamic acid, serine, histidine, glycine, threonine, arginine, alanine, tyrosine, valine, methionine, phenylalanine, isoleucine, leucine, lysine, and proline. The recovered mass of each residue was calculated, summed together giving a total approximate protein mass, and then calculated into a percent protein for each Arabidopsis seed sample.

Example 5 Total Starch Analysis for Fresh Arabidopsis

Fresh Arabidopsis leaves were ground to a very fine powder under liquid nitrogen by grinding tissue in a mortar and pestle. The samples were de-sugared by 80% ethanol prior to starch analysis. Digestion of starch was conducted with α-amylase and amyloglucosidase, respectively. The released glucose was detected by glucose oxidase- and peroxidase-based enzyme assay. Starch content was calculated based on the released glucose with adjustment of free glucose to starch.

Example 6 LC/MSMS Metabolite Analysis

Arabidopsis leaf tissue was ground manually with liquid nitrogen and a mortar and pestle to obtain a very fine powder sample. Approximately 100 mg of finely ground leaf tissue was extracted with an 80:20 methanol; 0.1N HCl solution and mixed well resulting in a 350 mg/mL extraction. Samples were centrifuged to pellet particulates and an aliquot of the supernatant containing the extracted metabolites was removed, diluted 1:10 with 80:20 acetonitrile:water containing a stable isotope of glucose as an internal standard, and analyzed by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection (LC-MS/MS).

LC-MS/MS provides selectivity and sensitivity suitable for quantitative analysis of primary and secondary metabolites in complex biological matrices such as seed tissue extracts. A liquid chromatographic separation prior to MS/MS quantitation is desirable to separate the compounds of interest from matrix components that may suppress the ionization/response of the compound of interest. Several techniques are available to ionize the analytes including positive (+) or negative (−) electro spray ionization (ESI) and +/−atmospheric chemical ionization (APCI). MS/MS analysis of compounds is essentially a four-step process: 1) formation of a molecular ion specific to the compound of interest; 2) selection of the molecular ions; 3) formation of compound specific fragment ions; 4) detection of the compound specific fragment ions. The eluent from the LC column is introduced into the MS, which continuously performs the four-step process on a millisecond timeframe.

The LC-MSMS analyses in this study was performed on an Agilent 1100 liquid chromatograph interfaced to an Applied Biosystems Sciex™ 3000 triple quadrapole tandem mass spectrometer equipped with a TurboIon™ Spray inlet. Prior to LC-MS/MS analysis of seed tissue extracts, standards (˜10 μg/mL) of the individual secondary metabolites were infused (10 μL/minute) into the mass spectrometer in order to establish the following parameters:

-   -   Q1—m/z of +/− molecular ion     -   DP—declustering potential for maximum formation of molecular ion     -   Q3—m/z of product ions generated from the molecular ion     -   CE—collision energy for maximum formation of product ions     -   CXP—cell exit potential

The Arabidopsis metabolites monitored in this study were found to form the expected [M-H]⁻ molecular ion using negative mode ESI, Q1, as shown in Table 3 below. The fragment ions used for quantitation for each of the metabolites are listed in the table below, Q3. The following table lists the MSMS parameters used to quantitate each of the metabolites (G1P=glucose-1-phosphate, G6P=glucose-6-phosphate, ADP-g=adenosine diphosphate-glucose, GDP-g=guanosine 5′-diphosphate-glucose, UDP-g=uridine 5′-diphosphate-glucose).

TABLE 3 Fragment ions m/z Analyte Q1 Q3 DP (V) CE (V) CXP (V) G6P 258.9 139.1 −34 −21 −6 G1P 258.8 240.9 −32 −18 −14 ADP-g 588.1 345.9 −35 −35 −22 GDP-g 604.2 361.8 −33 −36 −22 UDP-g 565.1 322.9 −35 −34 −22 Fructose 179.0 113.1 −29 −12 −5 Glucose 179.0 119.1 −30 −10 −5 Sucrose 341.1 178.9 −56 −20 −10

Because of the high polarity of the Arabidopsis metabolites of interest, a HILIC phase liquid chromatographic column (TSKgel Amide 80, TOSOH Biosciences LLC, 100×2 mm, 5 μM) was used for separation. A linear gradient starting at 0:100 HPLC water:acetonitrile going to 100:0 water:acetonitrile over four minutes at a flow rate of 500 μL/minute was used. To enhance compound ionization, the water was buffered with 10 mM ammonium acetate.

Quantitation was achieved by creating a calibration curve for each targeted metabolite and using linear regression analysis on each extract. The concentration found in the extract multiplied by the dilution factor (10) to obtain a total nmol g⁻¹ concentration in the sample. All data presented is the mean of six replicates, three analytical replicates and two greenhouse replicates.

Example 7 Construction of SnRK2-6 Expression Vector for Arabidopsis Transformation

To amplify Arabidopsis SnRK2-6 gene, total RNA (900 ng) isolated from Arabidopsis leaves was used for single strand cDNA synthesis using Oligo dT20 as primer (Invitrogen SuperScriptIII RT kit). The sscDNA was further amplified using a pair of primers, 5′-TAA TTT CCA TGG ATC GAC CAG CAG TGA GT-3′ and 5′-TTT TTT CCA TGG ATC ACA TTG CGT ACA CAA TCT CT-3′, both of which include a Nco I site (underlined). The amplified SnRK2-6 gene was then digested with Nco I and inserted into the gateway entry vector pDAB3731. The insert orientation was determined by sequencing. The resulting plant transcription unit (PTU) comprising CsVMV, SnRK2-6 and AtuORF24 3′-UTR was cloned into the binary gateway destination vector pDAB3725 using gateway LR reaction. The resulting plasmid, designated pDAB4504 (FIG. 11), was used for Agrobacterium transformation.

Example 8 Synthetic Plant-Optimized Coding Region for SnRK2-6

A synthetic version of the coding sequence of an Arabidopsis thaliana SnRK2-6 gene was designed to enable production of the SnRK2-6 protein in transgenic dicot and monocot (e.g., maize) plants. The starting base sequence was Genbank Accession No. At4g33950, comprising a protein coding region as disclosed in SEQ ID NO:1, and encoding the protein sequence disclosed as SEQ ID NO:2.

To provide a plant-optimized DNA sequence encoding an SnRK2-6 protein, a DNA sequence was designed to encode the amino acid sequence of the protein, utilizing a redundant genetic code established from a codon bias table compiled from protein coding sequences of genes found in the particular host plants (maize and dicots). The protein coding regions of 706 maize genes (Zea mays) were extracted from Genbank, which is available from the National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine (Bethesda, Md.), and codon composition was calculated using the CodonFrequency function of the Wisconsin Sequence Analysis Package, available from Genetics Computer Group, University of Wisconsin (Madison, Wis.). Codon usage tables for tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; 453,797 codons), cotton (Gossypium hirsutum; 62,111 codons), soybean (Glycine max; 362,096 codons), and canola (Brassica napus; 195,005 codons) are available from Kazusa DNA Research Institute (JAPAN).

TABLE 4A Codon distributions in genes of maize and four dicot species. C D E F A Plant Plant Maize Dicot G H I J Amino B Weighted Average Average Average Cotton Canola Tobacco Soybean Acid Codon Average % % % % % % % % ALA (A) GCA 27.5 22.9 18 27.8 26.4 23.3 31.0 30.3 GCC 33.0 27.4 34 20.9 22.6 21.2 17.3 22.5 GCG DNU DNU 24 9.8 8.2 14.2 8.1 8.5 GCT 39.5 33 24 41.6 42.8 41.3 43.6 38.7 ARG (R) AGA 29.0 22.9 15 30.7 28.5 31.8 31.7 30.9 AGG 32.5 25.6 26 25.3 26.8 22.1 24.6 27.6 CGA DNU DNU 9 10.6 12.2 9.9 11.9 8.2 CGC 21.3 16.8 24 9.5 8.5 8.9 8.1 12.7 CGG DNU DNU 15 7.7 8.5 8.6 7.7 6.0 CGT 17.2 13.6 11 16.2 15.6 18.6 16.0 14.5 ASN (N) AAC 59.5 59.5 68 51.0 51.9 62.6 39.4 50.0 AAT 40.5 40.5 32 49.0 48.1 37.4 60.6 50.0 ASP (D) GAC 49.9 49.9 63 36.7 35.1 42.5 31.1 38.1 GAT 50.1 50.1 37 63.3 64.9 57.5 68.9 61.9 CYS (C) TGC 58.4 58.4 68 48.7 53.1 49.2 42.6 50.0 TGT 41.6 41.6 32 51.3 46.9 50.8 57.4 50.0 END TAA DNU 30.1 20 40.2 39.1 38.5 42.6 40.7 TAG DNU 21.1 21 21.2 20.3 22.1 19.6 22.7 TGA 100.0 48.8 59 38.6 40.6 39.4 37.8 36.6 GLN (Q) CAA 46.7 46.7 38 55.5 57.4 50.0 58.9 55.5 CAG 53.3 53.3 62 44.5 42.6 50.0 41.1 44.5 GLU (E) GAA 39.8 39.8 29 50.5 52.4 43.6 55.7 50.5 GAG 60.2 60.2 71 49.5 47.6 56.4 44.3 49.5 GLY (G) GGA 26.1 26.1 19 33.2 29.9 36.4 34.6 31.9 GGC 29.8 29.8 42 17.5 18.3 16.2 16.2 19.3 GGG 18.0 18.0 19 17.0 19.0 15.2 15.4 18.4 GGT 26.1 26.1 20 32.3 32.7 32.1 33.7 30.4 HIS (H) CAC 52.7 52.7 62 43.4 41.0 49.6 38.3 44.8 CAT 47.3 47.3 38 56.6 59.0 50.4 61.7 55.2 ILE (I) ATA 18.3 18.3 14 22.7 20.4 21.1 25.8 23.4 ATC 45.7 45.7 58 33.3 36.1 42.7 24.6 29.9 ATT 36.0 36.0 28 44.0 43.5 36.2 49.6 46.7

TABLE 4B Codon distributions in genes of maize and four dicot species. C D F A Plant Plant E Dicot G H I J Amino B Weighted Average Maize Average Cotton Canola Tobacco Soybean Acid Codon Average % % % % % % % % LEU (L) CTA DNU DNU 8 9.4 7.8 10.1 10.5 9.1 CTC 26.3 21.8 26 17.7 16.7 22.8 13.0 18.1 CTG 24.7 20.5 29 12.0 12.0 11.6 11.2 13.2 CTT 26.0 21.6 17 26.1 27.9 25.2 25.9 25.5 TTA DNU DNU 5 11.4 10.5 10.1 15.3 9.8 TTG 23.1 19.2 15 23.4 25.1 20.2 24.0 24.2 LYS (K) AAA 33.5 33.5 22 45.1 43.1 44.6 50.0 42.5 AAG 66.5 66.5 78 54.9 56.9 55.4 50.0 57.5 MET (M) ATG 100.0 100.0 100 100 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 PHE (F) TTC 61.0 61.0 71 51.0 54.3 58.6 41.9 49.2 TTT 39.0 39.0 29 49.0 45.7 41.4 58.1 50.8 PRO (P) CCA 30.4 30.4 26 34.8 34.0 29.6 38.9 36.5 CCC 20.0 20.0 24 16.0 16.6 14.6 13.6 19.2 CCG 20.0 20.0 28 12.0 11.1 18.4 10.0 8.3 CCT 29.6 29.6 22 37.3 38.2 37.3 37.5 36.0 SER (S) AGC 24.9 19.0 23 15.0 16.4 16.0 12.5 15.1 AGT DNU DNU 9 15.9 15.2 14.1 17.3 17.1 TCA 23.6 18.0 16 20.1 18.9 18.2 22.6 20.6 TCC 25.8 19.7 23 16.4 17.8 16.7 14.1 16.9 TCG DNU DNU 14 8.4 9.5 10.7 7.2 6.1 TCT 25.7 19.6 15 24.2 22.1 24.3 26.2 24.2 THR (T) ACA 25.2 25.2 21 29.4 28.9 26.3 32.7 29.7 ACC 31.1 31.1 37 25.3 27.6 26.9 19.1 27.7 ACG 16.7 16.7 22 11.3 11.4 16.9 8.8 8.3 ACT 27.0 27.0 20 34.0 32.2 30.0 39.4 34.3 TRP (W) TGG 100.0 100.0 100 100 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 TYR (Y) TAG 61.3 61.3 73 49.6 49.4 59.4 41.4 48.2 TAT 38.7 38.7 27 50.4 50.6 40.6 58.6 51.8 VAL (V) GTA DNU DNU 8 13.0 11.5 10.8 18.3 11.5 GTC 28.9 25.9 32 19.8 20.2 24.1 17.0 17.8 GTG 37.3 33.4 39 27.8 26.7 28.3 24.3 32.0 GTT 33.7 30.2 21 39.4 41.5 36.8 40.4 38.7

Native gene codon usages for maize genes are shown in Tables 4A and 4B, Columns E, and those for the dicots genes are shown in Tables 4A and 4B, Columns G-J. The values in Columns E and G-J present the distributions (in % of usage for all codons for that amino acid) of synonymous codons for each amino acid. The codons most preferred by each plant type are indicated in bold font, and the second, third, or fourth, etc, choices of codons can be identified when multiple choices exist. It is evident that some synonymous codons for some amino acids are found only rarely in dicot genes (e.g., CGG and TCG). Also, some dicot plants differ somewhat in codon preference for particular amino acids (e.g., Asparagine and Phenylalanine codons). It is also evident that some synonymous codons for some amino acids are found only rarely in plant protein coding regions (e.g., CGA and CTA). Further, maize and dicot plants differ in codon usage (e.g., Alanine codon GCC occurs more frequently in maize genes than in dicot genes, while Alanine codon GCT is more often used in dicot genes than in maize genes). Thus, it is obvious that a protein coding region designed to reflect the optimal codon composition of genes of one plant group may have a suboptimal codon composition for expression in another plant group. To derive a biased codon set that comprises the most-highly used codons common to maize and dicots, an average for each codon was calculated for the dicot plant dataset shown in Column F of Tables 4A and 4B.

The average % distribution value for each codon in maize and dicot genes was calculated from the data in Tables 4A and 4B, Columns E and F, and is presented as the Plant Average in Tables 4A and 4B, Column D. Usually, the % usage values of a codon considered to be rarely used (i.e., represented at about 10% or less of the time to encode the relevant amino acid in genes of either maize or dicot plants) were not included in the analysis. These codon values are indicated by DNU (Do Not Use) in Tables 4A and 4B, Column D. In those instances, the total % codon usage values for the individual amino acids do not total 100% in Tables 4A and 4B, Column D.

To balance the distribution of the remaining codon choices for those amino acids, a Weighted Average % representation for each codon was calculated, using the formula: Weighted Average % of C1=1/(% C1+% C2+% C3+etc.)×% C1×100, where

-   -   C1 is the codon in question and % C2, % C3, etc., represent the         Plant Average % values for the remaining synonymous codons, as         shown in Column D of Tables 4A and 4B.

The Plant Weighted Average % distributions of codons calculated for maize and dicots genes are presented in Tables 4A and 4B, Column C. Thus, the codon identities of Columns B, taken together with the % distribution values in Columns C, comprise a Plant-Optimized Codon Bias Table calculated from genes of maize, cotton, canola, tobacco, and soybean. A Plant-Optimized gene will be determined to have an overall codon distribution similar to the codon distribution in Tables 4A and 4B, Columns C.

To engineer a Plant-Optimized sequence encoding an SnRK2-6 protein, a DNA sequence was designed to encode the amino acid sequence of the protein, utilizing a redundant Plant Optimized Codon Bias Table compiled from the protein coding sequences of dicots and maize. The native SnRK2-6 DNA sequence (SEQ ID NO:1) was translated into the deduced amino sequence of the SnRK2-6 protein (SEQ ID NO:2), then the protein sequence was reverse-translated into a Plant-Optimized DNA sequence using the OptGene™ program, which is commercially available from Ocimum Biosolutions (Indianapolis, Ind.). Further refinements of the sequence were made to eliminate undesirable restriction enzyme recognition sites, potential plant intron splice sites, long runs of A/T or C/G residues, and other motifs that might interfere with RNA stability, transcription, or translation of the coding region in plant cells. Other changes were made to introduce desired restriction enzyme recognition sites, and to eliminate long internal Open Reading Frames (frames other than +1) and unusually stable stemloops structures. These changes were all made within the constraints of retaining the Plant-Optimized biased codon composition as described above. The Plant-Optimized sequence encoding the SnRK2-6 protein is designated SnRK2-6 hv5, and the sequence is disclosed as SEQ ID NO:3, encoding SEQ ID NO:2.

Table 5 compares the codon compositions of the Plant-Optimized SnRK2-6 hv5 coding region with the Plant-Optimized Codon Biased table, thus demonstrating the result of the optimization process.

TABLE 5 Comparison of Codon Compositions of native SnRK2-6 coding region, Plant-Optimized version hv5, and the Plant-Optimized Codon Bias Composition Native Optimized Plant Amino SnRK2-6 SnRK2-6 Optimized Acid Codon % hv5% Average ALA (A) GCA 52.4 28.6 27.5 GCC 9.5 33.3 33.0 GCG 9.5 0.0 DNU GCT 28.6 38.1 39.5 ARG (R) AGA 35.0 30.0 29.0 AGG 35.0 30.0 32.5 CGA 15.0 0.0 DNU CGC 10.0 20.0 21.3 CGG 0.0 0.0 DNU CGT 5.0 20.0 17.2 ASN (N) AAC 33.3 60.0 59.5 AAT 66.7 40.0 40.5 ASP (D) GAC 33.3 53.3 49.9 GAT 66.7 46.7 50.1 CYS (C) TGC 16.7 66.7 58.4 TGT 83.3 33.3 41.6 END TAA 0.0 0.0 DNU TAG 0.0 0.0 DNU TGA 100.0 100.0 100.0  GLN (Q) CAA 54.5 45.5 46.7 CAG 45.5 54.5 53.3 GLU (E) GAA 55.2 37.9 39.8 GAG 44.8 62.1 60.2 GLY (G) GGA 52.6 26.3 26.1 GGC 21.1 31.6 29.8 GGG 5.3 15.8 18.0 GGT 21.1 26.3 26.1 HIS (H) CAC 33.3 58.3 52.7 CAT 66.7 41.7 47.3 ILE (I) ATA 37.9 17.2 18.3 ATC 31.0 48.3 45.7 ATT 31.0 34.5 36.0 LEU (L) CTA 16.7 0.0 DNU CTC 13.3 33.3 26.3 CTG 13.3 0.0 24.7 CTT 13.3 33.3 26.0 TTA 30.0 0.0 DNU TTG 13.3 33.3 23.1 LYS (K) AAA 35.3 29.4 33.5 AAG 64.7 70.6 66.5 MET (M) ATG 100 100 100.0  PHE (F) TTC 61.5 61.5 61.0 TTT 38.5 38.5 39.0 PRO (P) CCA 23.8 42.9 30.4 CCC 9.5 23.8 20.0 CCG 23.8 0.0 20.0 CCT 42.9 33.3 29.6 SER (S) AGC 24.0 24.0 24.9 AGT 20.0 0.0 DNU TCA 20.0 16.0 23.6 TCC 12.0 28.0 25.8 TCG 8.0 0.0 DNU TCT 16.0 32.0 25.7 THR (T) ACA 15.4 30.8 25.2 ACC 15.4 38.5 31.1 ACG 15.4 0.0 16.7 ACT 53.8 30.8 27.0 TRP (W) TGG 100 100 100.0  TYR (Y) TAC 30.8 61.5 61.3 TAT 69.2 38.5 38.7 VAL (V) GTA 8.3 0.0 DNU GTC 8.3 29.2 28.9 GTG 12.5 37.5 37.3 GTT 70.8 33.3 33.7

To complete the design, a 5′ Untranslated Sequence containing translational Stop codons in all three top strand reading frames, and initiated by a recognition sequence for Bbs I restriction enzyme, was added to the 5′ end of the SnRK2-6 hv5 sequence. Additionally, a 3′ Untranslated Sequence containing translational Stop codons in all six open reading frames, and terminated by the recognition sequence for Sac I restriction enzyme, was added to the 3′ end of the SnRK2-6 hv5 sequence. This sequence, called SnRK2-6 hv6, is disclosed as SEQ ID NO:4. Synthesis of the SnRK2-6 hv6 designed sequence was contracted to PicoScript in Houston, Tex.

Example 9 Construction of SnRK2-6 Expression Vector for Corn Transformation

To heterologously express SnRK2-6 gene in corn, its open reading frame sequence was codon optimized according to hemicot codon usage, thus designated SnRK2-6 hv. Additionally, the nucleotide sequences corresponding to “3-frame stops” and “maize consensus” were introduced to 5′-terminus of the SnRK2-6 hv gene, and “6-frame stops” to its 3′-terminus. To facilitate subsequent cloning, two restriction sites, Bbs I and Sac I, were added to 5′- and 3′-end of the sequence. Then, the entire sequence was synthesized, which is described in further detail below.

The above synthesized fragment digested with Bbs I and Sac I was inserted into Acc65 I- and Sac I-digested pDAB4005. This created a plant transcription unit (PTU) containing maize Ubi1 promoter, SnRK2-6 hv and ZmPer5 3′UTR. The PTU was excised from the recombinant pDAB4005 through digestion with Not I and inserted into the destination vector pDAB3878. The orientation and integrity of the resulting plasmid, designated pDAB7702, which is shown in FIG. 12, was determined by sequencing.

Example 10 Agrobacterium and Arabidopsis Transformation

The transformation was conducted as described by Weigel and Glazebrook (2002).

Arabidopsis thaliana Growth Conditions

Freshly harvested seed was allowed to dry for 7 days at room temperature in the presence of desiccant. Seed was suspended in a 0.1% Agarose solution, which is commercially available from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). The suspended seed was stored at 4° C. for two days to complete dormancy requirements and ensure synchronous seed germination (stratification).

Sunshine Mix LP5, which is commercially available from Sun Gro Horticulture Inc. (Bellevue, Wash.) was covered with fine vermiculite and sub-irrigated with Hoaglan's solution until wet. The soil mix was allowed to drain for 24 hours. Stratified seed was sown onto the vermiculite and covered with humidity domes, such as those commercially available from KORD Products (Bramalea, Ontario, Canada) for five to seven days.

Seeds were germinated and plants were grown in a Conviron (models CMP4030 and CMP3244), which are commercially available from Controlled Environments Limited (Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada) under long day conditions (16 hours light/8 hours dark) at a light intensity in a range of from about 120 μmol/m2 sec to about 150 μmol/m2 sec under constant temperature of about 22° C. and a humidity in a range of from about 40% to about 50%. Plants were initially watered with Hoaglan's solution and subsequently with DI water to keep the soil moist but not wet.

Agrobacterium Transformation

Electro-competent Agrobacterium tumefaciens (strain Z707S) cells were prepared using a protocol from Weigel and Glazebrook (2002). The competent agro cells were transformed using an electroporation method adapted from Weigel and Glazebrook (2002). Fifty (50) μl of competent agro cells were thawed on ice and about 10 nm to about 25 ng of the plasmid pDAB4504 was added to the cells. The DNA and cell mix was added to pre-chilled 2 mm electroporation cuvettes. An Eppendorf Electroporator 2510, which is commercially available from Eppendorf AG (Hamburg, Germany), was used for the transformation at the following settings: Voltage: 2.4 kV, Pulse length: 5 msec. After electroporation, 1 mL of YEP broth was added to the cuvette and the cell-YEP suspension was transferred to a 15 ml culture tube. The cells were incubated at 28° C. in a water bath with constant agitation for four hours. After incubation, the culture was plated on YEP+agar with spectinomycin (100 mg/L) and streptomycin (250 mg/L), which are commercially available from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, Mo.). The plates were incubated for 2-4 days at 28° C. Colonies were selected and streaked onto fresh YEP+agar with spectinomycin (100 mg/L) and streptomycin (250 mg/L) plates and incubated at about 28° C. for one to three days. Colonies were selected for restriction digest analysis to verify the presence of the gene insert by using vector specific restriction digest enzymes. Qiagen High Speed Maxi Preps, performed per manufacturer's instructions, were used to purify the plasmid DNA from selected Agrobacterium colonies. Plasmid DNA from the binary vector used in the Agrobacterium transformation was included as a control. Four separate digest reactions were run using 0.5-1 μg of DNA. The reaction was allowed to run for about four hours to about five hours and was analyzed by 0.65% agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by ethidium bromide staining. A colony was selected whose digest for all enzymes was identical to the plasmid control.

Arabidopsis Transformation

Arabidopsis was transformed using the floral dip method. The selected colony was used to inoculate one or more 15 mL pre-cultures of YEP broth containing spectinomycin (100 mg/L) and streptomycin (250 mg/L). The culture(s) was incubated overnight at about 28° C. with constant agitation at 220 rpm. Each pre-culture was used to inoculate two, 500 ml cultures of YEP broth containing spectinomycin (100 mg/L) and streptomycin (250 mg/L) and the cultures were incubated overnight at about 28° C. with constant agitation. The cells were then pelleted at about 8700×g for about ten minutes at room temperature (i.e., about 24° C.), and the resulting supernatant discarded. The cell pellet was gently resuspended in 500 mL infiltration media containing: ½× Murashige and Skoog salts and Gamborg's B5 vitamins, 10% (w/v) sucrose, 0.044 μM benzylamino purine (10 μl/liter of 1 mg/ml stock in DMSO) and 300 μl/liter SILWET L-77, which is commercially available from Helena Chemical Company (Collierville, Tenn.). Plants about five weeks old were dipped into the media for about 15 seconds, being sure to submerge the newest inflorescence. The plants were then lay down on their sides and covered (transparent or opaque) for about 24 hours, then washed with water, and placed upright. The plants were grown at about 22° C., with a 16-hour light/8-hour dark photoperiod. About four weeks after dipping, the seeds were harvested.

Selection of Transformed Plants

T1 seed was sown on 10.5″×21″ germination trays, which are commercially available from T.O. Plastics Inc. (Clearwater, Minn.) as described and grown under the conditions outlined. The domes were removed five to six days post sowing. Five days post-sowing and again ten days post-sowing seedlings were sprayed with a 0.20% solution (20 μl/10 mL deionized water) of glufosinate herbicide, which is commercially available from Bayer Cropscience, in a spray volume of about 10 ml/tray (703 L/ha) using a DeVilbiss compressed air spray tip (Glendale Heights, Ill.) to deliver an effective rate of 280 g/ha glufosinate per application. The amount of Liberty to prepare was calculated as follows: (703 L/ha spray volume=280 GPA). (280 g ai/ha)×(1 ha/703 L)×(1 L/200 g ai glufosinate)=0.20% solution (i.e., 20 μl/10 ml). Ten (10) mL of the solution was pipetted into a 20 mL scintillation vial for each tray to be sprayed. The spray was delivered using a horizontal and vertical application pattern. After each spray, a spray label with the herbicide name, application rate and application date was added to each selection tray. Four to seven days after the second spray herbicide resistant plants were identified and transplanted into pots prepared with Sunshine mix LP5. Transplanted plants were placed in a conviron with the above mentioned growth conditions.

Example 11 Agrobacterium Transformation for Superbinary Vectors

To prepare for transformation, two different E. coli strains (DH5α containing the pSB11 precursor {either pDAB7702 or pDAB3878 in this case} and pRK2013) were grown at 37° C. overnight. The DH5α strain was grown on a petri plate containing LB (5 g Bacto Tryptone, 2.5 g Bacto Yeast Extract, 5 g NaCl, 7.5 g Agar, in 500 ml deionized water)+Spectinomycin (100 μg/ml) and the pRK2013 strain was grown on a petri plate containing LB+Kanamycin (50 μg/ml). After incubation the plates were placed at about 4° C. to await the availability of the Agrobacterium.

Agrobacterium strain LBA4404 containing pSB1 (Japan Tobacco) was grown on a petri plate containing AB medium (5 g Glucose, 15 g Agar, in 900 ml deionized water) with Streptomycin (250 μg/ml) and Tetracycline (10 μg/ml) at 28° C. for three days. After the Agrobacterium was ready, transformation plates were set up by mixing one inoculating loop of each bacteria (pDAB7702 or pDAB3878, pRK2013, and LBA4404+pSB1) on a LB plate with no antibiotics. This plate was incubated at 28° C. overnight. After incubation 1 ml of 0.9% NaCl (4.5 g NaCl in 500 ml deionized water) solution was added to the mating plate and the cells were mixed into the solution. The mixture was then transferred into a labeled sterile tube, such a Falcon 2059, which is commercially available from Becton Dickinson and Co. (Franklin Lakes, N.J.).

One (1) ml of 0.9% NaCl was added to the plate and the remaining cells were mixed into the solution. This mixture was then transferred to the same labeled tube as above. Serial dilutions of the bacterial cells were made ranging from 10¹-10⁴ by placing 100 μl of the bacterial “stock” solution into labeled Falcon 2059 tubes and then adding 900 μl of 0.9% NaCl. To ensure selection, 100 μl of the dilutions were then plated onto separate AB+Spectinomycin (100 μg/ml)/Streptomycin (250 μg/ml)/Tetracycline (10 μg/ml) and incubated at 28° C. for four days. The colonies were then “patched” onto AB+Spec/Strep/Tet plates as well as lactose medium (0.5 g Yeast Extract, 5 g D-lactose monohydrate, 7.5 g Agar, in 500 ml DI H₂O) plates and placed in the incubator at 28° C. for two days. A Keto-lactose test was performed on the colonies on the lactose media by flooding the plate with Benedict's solution (86.5 g Sodium Citrate monobasic, 50 g Na₂CO₃, 9 g CuSO₄-5 water, in 500 ml of deionized water) and allowing the agro colonies to turn yellow. Any colonies that were yellow (positive for agro) were then picked from the patch plate and streaked for single colony isolation on AB+Spec/Strep/Tet plates at 28° C. for two days. One colony per plate was picked for a second round of single colony isolations on AB+Spec/Strep/Tet media and this was repeated for a total of three rounds of single colony isolations. After the isolations, one colony per plate was picked and used to inoculate separate 3 ml YEP (5 g Yeast Extract, 5 g Peptone, 2.5 g NaCl, in 500 ml deionized water) liquid cultures containing Spectinomycin (100 μg/ml), Streptomycin (250 μg/ml), and Tetracycline (10 μg/ml). These liquid cultures were then grown overnight at 28° C. in a drum incubator at 200 rpm.

Validation cultures were then stated by transferring 2 ml of the inoculation cultures to 250 ml disposable flasks containing 75 ml of YEP+Spec/Strep/Tet. These were then grown overnight at 28° C. while shaking at 200 rpm. Following the Qiagen® protocol, Hi-Speed maxi-preps, commercially available from Qiagen (Valencia, Calif.), were then performed on the bacterial cultures to produce plasmid DNA. 500 μl of the eluted DNA was then transferred to two clean, labeled 1.5 ml tubes and the Quick-Precip Plus® protocol, which is commercially available from Edge BioSystems (Gaithersburg, Md.), was performed. After the precipitation the DNA was resuspended in a total volume of 100 μl TE, including a mixture of 10 mM Tris HCl at pH 8.0 and 1 mM ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA). Five (5) μl of plasmid DNA was added to and gently mixed with 50 μl of chemically competent DH5α E. coli cells, commercially available from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.).

This mixture was then transferred to chilled and labeled Falcon 2059 tubes. The reaction was incubated on ice for about 30 minutes and then “Heat shocked” by increasing the temperature to about 42° C. for about 45 seconds. The reaction was placed back into the ice for about two minutes and then 450 μl of SOC medium, which is commercially available from Invitrogen (Carlsbad, Calif.), was added to the tubes. The reaction was then incubated at 37° C. for one hour, shaking at 200 rpm. The cells were then plated onto LB+Spec/Strep/Tet (using 50 μl and 100 μl) and incubated at 37° C. overnight. Three or four colonies per plate were picked and used to inoculate separate 3 ml LB (5 g Bacto Tryptone, 2.5 g Bacto Yeast Extract, 5 g NaCl, in 500 ml DI H₂O) liquid cultures containing Spectinomycin (100 μg/ml), Streptomycin (250 μg/ml), and Tetracycline (10 μg/ml). These liquid cultures were then grown overnight at 37° C. in a drum incubator at 200 rpm. Following the Qiagen® protocol, mini-preps (Qiagen, Valencia, Calif.) were then performed on the bacterial cultures to produce plasmid DNA. Five (5) μl of plasmid DNA was then digested in separate reactions using HindIII and SalI enzymes (New England Biolabs Beverly, Mass.) at 37° C. for one hour before being ran on a 1% agarose (Cambrex Bio science Rockland, Inc. Rockland, Me.) gel. The culture that showed the correct banding pattern was then used to create glycerol stocks by adding 500 μl of culture to 500 μl of sterile glycerol (Sigma Chemical Co.; St. Louis, Mo.) and inverting to mix. The mixture was then frozen on dry ice and stored at −80° C. until needed.

Example 12 Agrobacterium-mediated Transformation of Maize

Plant Material

Seeds from a High II F₁ cross (Armstrong et al., 1991) were planted into five-gallon pots containing a mixture of 95% Metro-Mix 360 soilless growing medium (Sun Gro Horticulture, Bellevue, Wash.) and 5% clay/loam soil. The plants were grown in a greenhouse using a combination of high pressure sodium and metal halide lamps with a 16:8 hour photoperiod. For obtaining immature F₂ embryos for transformation, controlled sib-pollinations were performed. Immature embryos were isolated at eight to ten days post-pollination when embryos were approximately 1.0 to 2.0 mm in size.

Infection and Cocultivation

Maize ears were surface sterilized by scrubbing with liquid soap, immersing in 70% ethanol for two minutes, and then immersing in 20% commercial bleach (0.1% sodium hypochlorite) for 30 minutes before being rinsed with sterile water. The Agrobacterium suspension was prepared by transferring one to two loops of bacteria grown on YEP medium (40 g/L peptone, 40 g/L yeast extract, 20 g/L NaCl, 15 g/L Bacto agar) containing 100 mg/L spectinomycin, 10 mg/L tetracycline, and 250 mg/L streptomycin at 28° C. for two to three days into 5 mL of liquid infection medium (LS Basal Medium (Linsmaier and Skoog, 1965), N6 vitamins (Chu et al., 1965), 1.5 mg/L 2,4-D, 68.5 g/L sucrose, 36.0 g/L glucose, 6 mM L-proline, pH 5.2) containing 100 μM acetosyringone. The solution was vortexed until a uniform suspension was achieved, and the concentration was adjusted to a final density of 200 Klett units, using a Klett-Summerson colorimeter with a purple filter. Immature embryos were isolated directly into a micro centrifuge tube containing 2 mL of the infection medium. Tubes were vortexed for three to five seconds, then the liquid medium was removed and replaced with fresh medium and vortexed again. The medium was removed a third time and replaced with 1 mL of the Agrobacterium solution with a density of 200 Klett units. The Agrobacterium and embryo solution was vortexed at maximum speed for 30 seconds, then incubated for five minutes at room temperature, before being transferred to co-cultivation medium (LS Basal Medium, N6 vitamins, 1.5 mg/L 2,4-D, 30.0 g/L sucrose, 6 mM L-proline, 0.85 mg/L AgNO₃, 1, 100 μM acetosyringone, 3.0 g/L Gellan gum, pH 5.8) for five days at 25° C. under dark conditions.

After co-cultivation, the embryos were moved through a two-step selection scheme after which transformed isolates were obtained over the course of approximately eight weeks. For selection, and LS based medium (LS Basal medium, N6 vitamins, 1.5 mg/L 2,4-D, 0.5 g/L MES, 30.0 g/L sucrose, 6 mM L-proline, 1.0 mg/L AgNO₃, 250 mg/L cephotaxime, 2.5 g/L Gellan gum, pH 5.7) was used with multiple selection levels of R-haloxyfop acid. The embryos were transferred to selection media containing 100 nM R-haloxyfop for 14 days, and then transferred to 500 nM R-haloxyfop at biweekly intervals about three more times until embryogenic isolates were obtained. Any recovered isolates were bulked up by transferring to fresh selection medium at two-week intervals for regeneration and further analysis.

Regeneration and Seed Production

For regeneration, the cultures were transferred to “28” induction medium (MS salts and vitamins, 30 g/L sucrose, 5 mg/L benzylaminopurine, 0.25 mg/L 2,4-D, 100 nM R-haloxyfop acid, 250 mg/L cephotaxime, 2.5 g/L Gellan gum, pH 5.7) for one week under low-light conditions (14 μEm⁻²s⁻¹) then 1 week under high-light conditions (approximately 89 μEm⁻²s⁻¹). Tissues were subsequently transferred to “36” regeneration medium (same as induction medium except lacking plant growth regulators). When plantlets grew to 3-5 cm in length, they were transferred to glass culture tubes containing SHGA medium (Schenk and Hildebrandt salts and vitamins (1972)), 1.0 g/L myo-inositol, 10 g/L sucrose and 2.0 g/L Gellan gum, pH 5.8) to allow for further growth and development of the shoot and roots. Plants were transplanted to the same soil mixture as described earlier herein and grown to flowering in the greenhouse. Controlled pollinations for seed production were conducted.

Example 13 Molecular Characterization of SnRK2-6 Transgenic Arabidopsis

To screen transgenic Arabidopsis plants carrying the transcription unit of SnRK2-6, PCR was conducted with a pair of primers, 5′-TGA GGT CTA CAG GCC AAA TTC GCT CTT AGC-3′ (SEQ ID NO:39) and 5′-ATC ACA TTG CGT ACA CAA TCT CT-3′ (SEQ ID NO:40), designed according to the sequence near T-DNA left border and 3′-end sequence of SnRK2-6, respectively. Genetic segregation of T2 transgenic plants was determined using PAT invader assay and herbicide spraying. Only those transgenic lines fit to 3:1 segregation were selected for biochemical and physiollogical studies as they are very like to carry single insertion.

Example 14 Molecular Characterization of SnRK2-6 hv Transgenic Corn

To screen transgenic corn plants carrying the transcription unit of SnRK2-6 hv, PCR was conducted with a pair of primers, 5′-GTG ACC CGG TCG TGC CCC TCT CTA GA-3′ (SEQ ID NO:41) and 5′-CCG TGG ATA TAT GCC GTG AAC AAT TG-3′ (SEQ ID NO:42) , designed according to ZmUbi 1 promoter and ZmPer5 3′UTR, respectively.

Example 15 Western Blot Analysis

Preparation of Polyclonal Antibodies

Two different kinds of polyclonal antibodies were prepared against two polypeptides, “CHRDLKLENTLLDGSPAPRLKICDFGYSKS” (30 amino acids) (SEQ ID NO:43) and “MNDNTMTTQFDESDQPGQSIEE” (22 amino acids) (SEQ ID NO:44), respectively. The first polypeptide is located at the amino acid positions from 137 to 166 in the kinase domain of SnRK2-6 protein, and the second peptide is located at the amino acid positions from 286 to 307 in the regulatory domain of SnRK2-6 protein. These two polypeptides were synthesized and conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin (KLH) as carrier protein. The resulting two different peptide-KLH conjugates were used for rabbit immunization to generate two different kinds of polyclonal antibodies. To purify the antibodies, the peptides were conjugated to bovine serum albumin (BSA), and the conjugates used for affinity chromatography.

Sample Preparation

The corn leaves from SNF1 kinase transformed plants and controls were sampled with dry ice and ground with liquid nitrogen to very fine powder. The proteins including the SNF1 kinase were extracted by adding ˜200 mg of the leaf powder in 1 mL of extract buffer (50 mM Tris, pH 8.0, 50 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 5 mM DTT, 0.05% Triton X-100). The protein concentrations of the extracts were measured by Bio-Rad protein assay and they varied from 3.2-3.8 mg/mL.

Western Blot

The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE using a Nupage 10% Bis-Tris gel, which is commercially available from Invitrogen, cat# NP0301Box (Carlsbad, Calif.) with MOPS running buffer. Then they were transferred onto nitrocellulose membrane with Tris/glycine buffer for one hour at 100 V. The membrane was blocked in PBST buffer containing 3% no-fat milk for one hour at room temperature (RT). The milk solution was poured off and fresh buffer containing the rabbit anti-SnRK2-6 polyclonal antibodies was added. The membrane was incubated one hour at RT, and then washed three times with PBST. After washing, fresh PBST/milk solution containing the goat anti-rabbit IgG-horseradish peroxidase conjugate was added to the membrane. After incubation for one hour at RT, the membrane was washed as described previously. For development, the membrane was removed from the PBST solution and immersed in freshly prepared ECL detection reagent (PIERCE, detection reagent 1—peroxide solution, Cal #1859701, and detection reagent 2—luminol enhancer solution, Cal #1859698). Chemiluminescence film (CL-Xposure Film, from PIERCE, cal #31460) was exposed to the treated membrane and developed with the Konica SR-X film developer.

Example 16 Heterologous Expression of SnRK2-6 Increases Corn Drought Tolerance

To test if SnRK2-6 kinase can exert the effect on biological processes in heterologous chromosomal backgrounds, we expressed the SnRK2-6 gene in corn. To establish its function, the gene sequence was codon-optimized according to hemicotyledon codon usage and then introduced into Hi II corn under the control of maize Ubi1 promoter. The expression of SnRK2-6 in corn transgenic lines was determined using Western blot based on polyclonal antibodies against SnRK2-6 peptides. The expressed protein had the expected size (42 kD), and showed the level readily detectable in the majority of the lines by Western blot. As control, non-transformant Hi II plants did not show a detectable level of any proteins at 42 kD (data not shown).

T₀ Hi II transgenic corn plants were reciprocally crossed with the inbred line 5XH751 to produce T1 seeds. The resulting T1 segregation populations were screened by PCR to separate null segregants and plants carrying the transgene. In the experiments designed to test drought tolerance, null segregants serve as control for those transgenic plants segregated from the same population because their genomic backgrounds are most similar to each other.

To eradicate the effect resulting from the genomic background difference, eight independent transgenic lines were used to assess the role of the transgene in drought tolerance in corn. In a relation to transpiration rate, water loss in detached leaves of null segregants and SnRK2-6 transgenic plants was measured during a period of leaf detachment. As shown in FIGS. 8 and 9, the transgenic plants showed a reduced rate of water loss compared to null segregants.

The transgenic corn plants appeared more tolerant to drought stress by visual observation. When 30-day-old corn plants were deprived of irrigation for six days, null segregants became more severe wilting than transgenic plants. In addition, transgenic plants were rehydrated much faster than null segregants. In an agreement with this, the biomass of upper parts of transgenic 64-day-old corn plants was 112% to 150% of null segregants at eight days after rehydration prior to which the plants were deprived of irrigation for nine days, as shown in Table 6. In Table 6, biomass of the transgenic plants is expressed as percentage of null segregants which are defined as 100.

TABLE 6 SnRK2-6 transgenic corn plants show a higher recovery rate from dehydration than null segregants. Parents Biomass (%) of T1 segregants Independent Transgene(s) in Transgenic Null T1 line Female female Male plants segregants 1 2221[1]-003.002 AAD1 5XH751 106.3 100 2 2221[2]-005.004 AAD1 5XH751 80.0 100 3 2280[2]-010.005 AAD1 5XH751 100.0 100 4 2280[1]-002.002 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 126.3 100 5 2280[1]-004.008 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 127.5 100 6 2280[1]-006.006 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 138.5 100 7 2280[1]-008.004 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 122.2 100 8 2280[2]-015.006 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 152.9 100 9 2280[2]-016.004 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 145.7 100 10 2280[3]-023.002 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 138.4 100 11 2280[3]-025.006 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 112.5 100 12 2280[3]-026.005 AAD1 + SnRK2-6 5XH751 116.7 100

In a field experiment conducted in Halfway, Tex., three independent transgenic corn events showed increased grain yield under a drought condition in the grain-filling stage as well as under a well-watered condition compared to their siblings without the SnRK2-6 transgene (null) (Table 7).

TABLE 7 Effect of SnRK2-6 transgene on corn grain yield under different water conditions in the field. Relative increase of grain weight per 10 plants (%) Well Drought stress in the Event Transgene Plot Location watered grain filling stage 2280[1]-002.R002.024R. SnRK2-6 101 Halfway, TX 16.4 11.8 Null 102 Halfway, TX 0.0 0.0 2280[2]-015.R001.025R. SnRK2-6 103 Halfway, TX 29.0 33.5 Null 104 Halfway, TX 0.0 0.0 2280[2]-016.R004.025R. SnRK2-6 105 Halfway, TX 14.3 8.3 Null 106 Halfway, TX 0.0 0.0

Collectively, the above results demonstrate that the constitutive expression of SnRK2-6 can increase corn drought tolerance. This can largely protect corn plants against drought, thereby reducing yield loss under drought condition.

Example 16 Stress Tolerance Genes

SnRK2-6 may be introduced into a plant in combination with one or more genes that confer stress tolerance in plants. Examples of suitable stress tolerance genes are shown in Table 8.

TABLE 8 Genes Involved in Post-Transcriptional Regulations Conferring Increased Abiotic Stress Tolerance Gene name Gene function Modification Transgenic phenotype AtSRL1^(a) Serine-arginine (SR) Up-regulation Salt tolerance RNA binding protein GRP2^(b) Glycine Rich RNA Up-regulation Cold and freezing tolerance binding protein AtRZ-1a^(c) Glycine Rich RNA Up-regulation Freezing tolerance binding protein STRS1, DEAD RNA Loss of function Tolerance to salt, osmotic, and heat STRS2^(d) helicase mutant stresses CSD2^(e) Cu/Zn Superoxide Mutagenesis of a Tolerance to oxidative stress conditions Dismutase miRNA recognition (high light, heavy metal, and methyl site viologen) XERICO^(f) E3 Ubiquitin ligase Up-regulation Drought tolerance by increased ABA level (up-regulation of AtNCED3) HOS1^(g) E3 Ubiquitin ligase Loss of function Constitutively vernalized (enhanced mutant cold-responsive gene expression) ^(a)J. Forment, M. A. Naranjo, M. Roldan, R. Serrano and O. Vicente, Expression of Arabidopsis SR-like splicing proteins confers salt tolerance to yeast and transgenic plants, Plant J. 30 (2002), pp. 511-519. ^(b)J. Y. Kim, S. J. Park, B. Jang, C. H. Jung, S. J. Ahn, C. H. Goh, K. Cho, O. Han and H. Kang, Functional characterization of a glycine-rich RNA-binding protein 2 in Arabidopsis thaliana under abiotic stress conditions, Plant J. 50 (2007), pp. 439-451 ^(c)Y. O. Kim, J. S. Kim and H. Kang, Cold-inducible zinc finger-containing glycine-rich RNA-binding protein contributes to the enhancement of freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana, Plant J. 42 (2005), pp. 890-900. ^(d)P. Kant, S. Kant, M. Gordon, R. Shaked and S. Barak, STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR1 and STRESS RESPONSE SUPPRESSOR2, two DEAD-Box RNA helicases that attenuate Arabidopsis responses to multiple abiotic stresses, Plant Physiol. 145 (2007), pp. 814-830. ^(e)R. Sunkar, A. Kapoor and J.-K. Zhu, Posttranscriptional induction of two Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase genes in Arabidopsis is mediated by downregulation of miR398 and important for oxidative stress tolerance, Plant Cell 18 (2006), pp. 2051-2065. ^(f)J. H. Ko, S. H. Yang and K. H. Han, Upregulation of an Arabidopsis RING-H2 gene, XERICO, confers drought tolerance through increased abscisic acid biosynthesis, Plant J. 47 (2006), pp. 343-355. ^(g)C. H. Dong, M. Agarwal, Y. Zhang, Q. Xie and J. K. Zhu, The negative regulator of plant cold responses, HOS1, is a RING E3 ligase that mediates the ubiquitination and degradation of ICE1, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103 (2006), pp. 8281-8286.

Example 17 Drought Tolerance Genes

SnRK2-6 may be introduced into a plant in combination with one or more genes that confer drought tolerance in plants. Examples of suitable drought tolerance genes are shown in Table 9.

TABLE 9 Drought Tolerance Genes Genes Function Mechanism of action References DREBs/CBFs; Stress induced transcription Enhanced expression of Oh et al. ABF3 factors downstream stress related (2005), Ito et genes confers al. (2006) drought/cold/salt tolerance. Constitutively overexpression can lead to stunting growth SNAC1 Stress induced transcription SNAC1 expression reduces Hu et al. factor water loss increasing (2006) stomatal sensitivity to ABA OsCDPK7 Stress induced Ca-dependent Enhanced expression of Saijo et al. protein kinase stress responsive genes (2000) Farnesyl-transferase Negative-regulator of ABA Down-regulation of Wang et al. (ERA1) sensing farnesyltransferase enhances (2005) the plant's response to ABA and drought tolerance reducing stomatal conductance Mn-SOD Mn-superoxide dismutase Overexpression improves McKersie et stress tolerance also in field al. (1996) conditions AVP1 Vacuolar H⁺-pyrophosphatase Overexpression facilitate Gaxiola et al. auxin fluxes leading to (2001), Park increased root growth et al. (2005) HVA1; OsLEA3 Stress induced LEA proteins Over-accumulation of LEA Bahieldin et increases drought tolerance al. (2005), also in field conditions Xiao et al. (2007) ERECTA A putative leucine-rich repeat ERECTA acts as a regulator Masle et al. receptor-like kinase is a major of transpiration efficiency (2005) contributor to a locus for Δ on with effects on stomatal Arabidopsis chromosome 2 density, epidermal cell expansion, mesophyll cell proliferation and cell-cell contact otsA and otsB Escherichia coli trehalose Increased trehalose Garg et al. biosynthetic genes accumulation correlates with (2002) higher soluble carbohydrate levels, elevated photosynthetic capacity and increased tolerance to photo-oxidative damage P5CS δ-Pyrroline-5-carboxylate Enhanced accumulation of Kavi Kishor synthetase proline leads to increased et al. (1995), osmotolerance Zhu et al. (1998) mtlD Mannitol-1-phosphate Mannitol accumulation leads Abebe et al. dehydrogenase to increased osmotolerance (2003) GF14λ 14-3-3 protein Lines overexpressing GF14λ Yan et al. have a “stay green” (2004) phenotype, improved water stress tolerance and higher photosynthetic rates under water deficit conditions NADP-Me NADP-malic enzyme The overexpression Laporte et al. decreased stomatal (2002) conductance and improves WUE

While this invention has been described in certain example embodiments, the present invention may be further modified within the spirit and scope of this disclosure. This application is therefore intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the invention using its general principles. Further, this application is intended to cover such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice in the art to which this invention pertains and which fall within the limits of the appended claims.

All references, including publications, patents, and patent applications, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein. The references discussed herein are provided solely for their disclosure prior to the filing date of the present application. Nothing herein is to be construed as an admission that the inventors are not entitled to antedate such disclosure by virtue of prior invention. 

What is claimed is:
 1. A plant having a genome to confer increased drought tolerance compared to a null seprepant control plant, wherein the genome contains a nucleic acid comprising the heterologous SEQ ID NO:3.
 2. A plant seed having a genome, wherein the genome contains a nucleic acid comprising the heterologous SEQ ID NO:3 to confer increased drought tolerance in a plant compared to a null segregant control plant.
 3. A method of producing transgenic plants by introducing a heterologous polynucleotide into a genome of the plant comprising: introducing a nucleic acid into the plant, wherein the nucleic acid comprises the heterologous SEQ ID NO:3 to confer increased drought tolerance in the plant compared to a null seprepant control plant.
 4. A method according to claim 3, wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of corn (Zea mays), borage (Borago spp.), Canola, castor (Ricinus communis), cocoa bean (Theobroma cacao), cotton (Gossypium spp), Crambe spp., Cuphea spp., flax (Linum spp.), Lesquerella and Limnanthes spp., Linola, nasturtium (Tropaeolum spp.), Oenothera spp., olive (Olea spp.), palm (Elaeis spp.), peanut (Arachis spp.), rapeseed, safflower (Carthamus spp.), soybean (Glycine and Soja spp.), sunflower (Helianthus spp.), tobacco (Nicotiana spp.), Vernonia spp., wheat (Triticum spp.), barley (Hordeum spp.), rice (Oryza spp.), oat (Avena spp.) sorghum (Sorghum spp.), rye (Secale spp.) and other members of the Gramineae.
 5. A plant material from the plant of claim 1, wherein the material comprises said nucleic acid.
 6. The plant material of claim 5, wherein the promoter is CsVMV.
 7. The plant material of claim 5, wherein the promoter is a native promoter.
 8. The plant material of claim 5, wherein the promoter is a Ubi1 promoter.
 9. The plant material of claim 5, wherein the plant material is selected from the group consisting of Borago spp., Canola, Ricinus spp., Theobroma spp., Zea spp., Gossypium spp, Crambe spp., Cuphea spp., Linum spp., Lesquerella spp., Limnanthes spp., Linola, Tropaeolum spp., Oenothera spp., Olea spp., Elaeis spp., Arachis spp., rapeseed, Carthamus spp., Glycine spp., Soja spp., Helianthus spp., Nicotiana spp., Vernonia spp., Triticum spp., Hordeum spp., Oryza spp., Avena spp., Sorghum spp., Secale spp., Brassicaceae, and other members of the plant family Gramineae. 